Displaying posts categorized under

Slavonic languages

Slavonic-Romanian etymological disputes

One of the fun aspects of reading Old Church Slavonic texts is encountering vocabulary that has disappeared from most modern Slavonic languages, but which persists as a loanword into Romanian even in the everyday conversational language. I thought I had found another example in Matthew 20:30–34: и сє дъва слѣпьса сѣдѧшта при пѫти слъішавъша ꙗко [...]

Russian calques in the Romanian of Moldova

While the intonation of Romanian in the Republic of Moldova does not greatly differ from across the border in Romania’s province of Moldavia, several decades in the USSR instilled the Moldovan language with a great many Russian calques. I was quite taken aback the first time I heard someone use the exhortation daţi să… ‘let’s’, a translation of Russian давай instead of the standard Romanian hai să. Doing a little research on the topic, I came across an article by Angela Arama that is a strident call to do away with these calques and return to a more traditionally Romanian way of speaking.

Turkic-Slavic bilingualism in Kyiv Rus

Paul Goble’s Russian political blog Window on Eurasia recently featured a post whose linguistic ramifications are intriguing: Olzhas Suleymenov, the Kazakh author of a book that some have helped lead to the rise of perestroika and the disintegration of the Soviet Union, says that he welcomes its translation into Ukrainian because Ukrainians will understand that [...]

The semantics of the year

In Indo-European linguistics I so often heard that the proto-language had four clearly defined seasons that I never thought that there could be other prevalent systems of natural cycles. In the collection Проблемы исторической лексикологии чувашского языка (Cheboksary, 1980) N. I. Yegorov contributes a paper titled ‘О названиях времен года в тюркских языках’ (The names [...]

Balkan multilingualism

Yesterday I bought in a Cluj used bookstore a Crestomație de literatură română veche (Cluj-Napoca: Editura Dacia, 1983), a selection of early Romanian-language documents edited with commentary, and printed on surprisingly good paper for the Ceaușescu era. As one might expect, the chrestomathy begins with the letter of Neacșu of Câmpulung, the first attestation of [...]

Romanian snow

A couple of years ago I read a fascinating paper by the Slavicist B.O. Unbegaun entitled ‘Les noms de la neige en roumain’, collected in Selected Papers on Russian and Slavonic Philology ed. R. Auty & A. E. Pennington (Oxford, 1969). While this theme is especially interesting to me because Cluj lies almost exactly on the isogloss between the words nea and omăt, I thought this paper would appeal to a fairly wide audience, and I felt it didn’t deserve to lie forgotten in an old Festschrift. So, I have translated it here into English. There’s probably a great deal of Franglish, but I’m tired and will further edit later.

A weird sound change in Romanian borrowings

I find it rather odd that Romanian has /f/ in some borrowings from Common Slavonic and Hungarian when the CS original had /x/. I don’t think I’ve come across this kind of shift in any other languages. To give examples: CS praxŭ ‘dust’ ∼ Ro. praf ‘dust, powder’. CS vrŭxŭ ‘top, summit’ ∼ Ro. vârf [...]

The poor choice of Russian-English dictionaries in Russia

When I was in Kyrgyzstan in June, I lost my Russian-English-Russian dictionary, Random House’s pocket dictionary that had served me well for over six years. I looked around for a new one in Bishkek, but options were few and in the end I got a cheap dictionary that evidentally had been made by a local [...]

The changing face of Russian nominal morphology

While I have learnt some languages fairly quickly and feel that I have mastered grammar if not idiom, Russian continues to present challenges. No matter how much I speak the language (it’s sometimes my daily working language in Helsinki), how much time I spend in Russia among native speakers, and how many textbooks I work [...]

Towards better support for OCS in Unicode

As discussed here before, Unicode so far supports the Old Church Slavonic Cyrillic script only partially, with notable gaps such as the ligature /ja/. In October, an international conference ‘The Standardization of the Old Church Slavonic Cyrillic Script and its Registration in Unicode’ was held in Belgrade. Its conclusions are now available on the web.