This is the linguistics weblog of Christopher Culver, who graduated with a B.A. Classics from Loyola University Chicago and is currently doing an M.A. in Finno-Ugrian linguistics at the University of Helsinki.

As this weblog contains content in numerous languages, written in various scripts, readers are encouraged to download and regularly update the fonts developed by the DejaVu font project.

Search

Archives

Categories

The Sun-language Theory

I knew the Turkish language reform involved some odd notions of linguistics, but Brent Brendemoen’s chapter on the process in The Turkic Languages (Routledge, 1998) introduced me to the weirdest part yet, the Sun-language Theory:

There are strong indications that Atatürk was not entirely happy with about the lists of proposed replacements for the Arabic and Persian words published by the TDK in the first years of the reform. In 1935 and 1936, a complete retreat was made with the introduction of the so-called Güneş Dil Teorisi, the ‘Sun-language Theory’, based on a draft that Atatürk had received from an Austrian Serb, Dr Hermann F. Kvergić. According to this theory of language development, Turkish was the mother of all languages. Thus it was no longer necessary to search for pure Turkish words to replace Arabic and Persian ones, since the ultimate origin of these words and languages was Turkish anyhow.

A fine introduction to the episode is an article by Geoffrey L. Lewis in the periodical Turkic Languages, vol. I issue 1 (1997). Kvergić’s work, “La Psychologie de quelques éléments des languages torques” was not entirely absurd, for it basically used Turkish as a mere example for some general musings about morphology:

The theme was that man first realized his own identity when he conceived the idea of establishing what the external objections surrounding him were. Language first consisted of gestures, to which some significant sounds were then added. Kvergić saw evidence for his view in the Turkish pronouns. M indicates oneself, as in men the ancient form of ben ‘I’, and elim ‘my hand’.

Things went bad when language reformers thought that Turkish retained somehow all of the primitive interjections, and therefore could be seen as the parent of all other languages. Lewis writes:

[The theory] saw the beginning of language as the moment when primitive man looked up at the sun and “Aaa!”

That vocable, , was the “first-degree radical of the Turkish language”. It originally meant sun, then sunlight, warmth, fire, height, bigness, power, god, master, motion, time, distance, life, colour, water, earth, voice. As man’s vocal mechanisms developed, other vowels and consonants became available, each with its own shade of meaning. Because the primeval exclamation was shouted, and it is obviously easier to begin a shout with a vowel than with a consonant, any word now beginning with a consonant originally began with a vowel, since abraded. The words yağmur ‘rain’, çamur ‘mud’, and hamur ‘dough’, for example, are compounded of ağmur ‘flowing water’, preceded by ay ‘high’, ‘earth’ and ah ‘food’ respectively. (The reader is urged not to waste time searching the dictionary for the last four words.)

… [The reformer] Dilmen began the next day with a lengthy outline of the theory, proving, among other things, the identity of English god, German Gott and Turkish kut ‘luck’. The proof is simple enough: Gott is + ot, god is + od, kut is uk + ut. He avoids explaining the second t of Gott by spelling it with only one t.

One Response to “The Sun-language Theory”

  1. Korkut Says:

    Hi There,

    I have been reading some comments in diffent websites regarding the Sun language theory and i am not surprized. For a sustainable emperialism, any theories like this will be demolished by the western scholars as these kind of theories would bring the western civilization into an end.
    If The Sun Language theory is rubbish, we all can have a laugh and carry on our lives but what if it is true and we demolish it??? That would mean we would defeat the chance of being able to deciphere the so-called “Unknown or dead civilizations/languages” and would be able to track and trace the history far better than ever? For instance many inscriptions have not been deciphered yet regarding Etruscans, Sumerians, Hittites and previous civilizations as the Latin and Greek languages were used to deciphere them. What if the Sun Language theory is correct and accurate and we can deciphere those inscriptions?? we can learn what really happend 10000 years ago and how really the main stream religions occured… the world culture would jump further more and it is fantastic for mankind.

    Please read the website below. It is a Russian website but it has an English version too.
    http://www.adji.ru

    Regards,
    Korkut, Ireland

Leave a Reply

If writing any text in a language other than English, please enclose it with <span xml:lang="XX" lang="XX">...</span> where XX is the two or three-letter ISO-639 code representing that language.